But of course, if an incident were really to upset the course of history itself, and an intervention from those from the future could prevent that, why would they attempt to prevent it unless the problem had happened and thus they knew of it, in which case this means their attempt to prevent the problem had not succeeded, result being there would be no need, point nor inclination in trying to stop it? The intention being to stop the incident, which would in turn cause the inclination to prevent a problem that never occurred to be non-existent.
An old article, but it's been resurrected in one of those 'the year gone by' filler articles that a lot of people are doing.
Is The Large Hadron Collider Being Sabotaged from the Future?
Everyone needs a causal loop on a late Saturday night.
But my point stands: the greatest mistake we make in the present time is expecting those from the future to be as pigheaded about things as we are now.
Post new comment